Wednesday, February 02, 2005

Rachel Mason, part 3

i have decided that rachel mason is not good. i wholeheartedly stand by this opinion. if i ever meet her, haha on her, because she won't know it's me. i am a mystery. what i was impressed with before, for the sake of clarity for my readers, was the extravagant strangeness of her failure. who else would make terra cotta plant holders in the shape of a very ugly person? well, scratch that, because people seem to like garden gnomes. but you know what i mean. i think her work is senseless. in terms of it being nonsensical. the mixture of materials had no narrative resonance. that is my new thought based on several hours of meditation.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Mountain man, you are fickle. Why don't you trust your expanding gut?